SlopScore
00 crowd

bad-day-receipt

Document what the day cost. Carry one thing forward with an interface that asks less of you.
Open repo on GitHub Open the demogithub.com/amydojo/bad-day-receipt
TypeScript · ★ 1 · 0 forks · MIT · paperwork by the Cap'mmostly ai (inferred)light human (inferred)works-on-my-machine (inferred)other
listed 50 minutes ago by amydojo · last checked 50 minutes ago
The owner didn't write this. This repo never submitted itself. The Cap'm found it on a truffle trawl and wrote its paperwork from what GitHub already shows. Picked by hand by the Cap'm on 2026-09-29: Document what the day cost. Carry one thing forward with an interface that asks less of you.; its own README says "utomatic external actions None Emotion detection None The official Build Week rules require a working project built with Codex and GPT-5". 1 stars; MIT license. The owner did not submit this. Votes count; awards don't until the owner claims it.

I'm not calling your project slop! Geeze, it's a joke... Do you own this repo?

Log in with GitHub as amydojo. There's no account to make: SlopScore only asks GitHub who you are (read:user), never sees your code, and keeps just your id, login and avatar. Then you can:

  • Keep it, on your terms. Commit your own slopscore.md (spec) and press Refresh. Your paperwork replaces the Cap'm's, and you can submit it for Slop of the Day.
  • Take it down. One click on Remove. It stays gone; the trawl never brings it back.

Log in with GitHub

Can't log in as the owner? Request a takedown. No login needed, and a trawled listing comes down right away.

GitHub says
Document what the day cost. Carry one thing forward with an interface that asks less of you.
website
https://bad-day-receipt.vercel.app
created
2026-07-13 · pushed 2 months ago · 843 commits · 1 contributor
languages
TypeScript 76%CSS 21%JavaScript 2%PLpgSQL 1%Python 0%HTML 0%
paperwork
licensereadme 42% health
dependencies
no dependency graph (no manifest, or disabled) · OSV.dev, checked 50 minutes ago

Disclosures, inferred by the Cap'm

slopbucket
vibe-coded
category
other
ai_generated
mostly
human_touch
light
status
works-on-my-machine
language (detected)
csshtmljavascriptplpgsqlpythontypescript
license (detected)
mit

The Cap'm's log

The Cap'm wrote this paperwork, not the owner. This repo never submitted itself to SlopScore. The Cap'm picked it by hand: Document what the day cost. Carry one thing forward with an interface that asks less of you.; its own README says "utomatic external actions None Emotion detection None The official Build Week rules require a working project built with Codex and GPT-5". It carries the MIT license. The disclosures above are his best guess from what GitHub shows.

Is this yours? Commit a real slopscore.md and press Refresh to replace this, or remove the listing in one click. There's no account to make: you log in with GitHub.

README — the repo's own words, folded up so the grading fits on one screen

Bad Day Receipt · Carry Forward

Document what the day cost. Carry one thing forward.

Bad Day Receipt is an emotional documentation machine for days that required more than the visible record shows. It turns invisible effort into a physical-feeling receipt, then lets the person decide what happens next.

The OpenAI Build Week contribution is Carry Forward and its post-receipt Three Valid Endings architecture. A completed receipt is already valid. The user may keep it, let it go, or carry one remaining obligation into One Thing Mode, a temporary interface containing only the information, decisions, and actions required to finish that task.

The result is not a chatbot. GPT-5.6 proposes a constrained task plan. The application validates it and renders only fixed, typed React components.

Open the live product · Build Week evidence · Production contract · Carry Forward specification

Submission status
Production is proven on Vercel from main at 00e23fc4cdac818e3fa5e86510a677a96ebb303d. The canonical deployment is READY, the live-domain smoke passed, and the public repository is MIT licensed. The primary Codex /feedback Session ID is 019f77c2-ce1f-7701-b96b-a81048803a36.


Build Week submission facts

Track Apps for Your Life
Project Bad Day Receipt · Carry Forward
Live demo https://bad-day-receipt.vercel.app
Repository Public, MIT licensed
Primary Codex Session ID 019f77c2-ce1f-7701-b96b-a81048803a36
Required model GPT-5.6
OpenAI API Responses API with Structured Outputs
Build Week contribution Carry Forward, One Thing Mode, and Three Valid Endings
Reference task Prepare a response to a synthetic insurance-denial email
Automatic external actions None
Emotion detection None

The official Build Week rules require a working project built with Codex and GPT-5.6, a public YouTube demo under three minutes with audio explaining both tools, a repository with setup and testing guidance, and the /feedback Session ID from the primary build thread. The final YouTube URL belongs in the Devpost submission once uploaded; this repository does not publish a placeholder link.


The product thesis

A difficult day can temporarily reduce available attention, working memory, decision-making capacity, and emotional effort.

The next interface usually does not care.

Bad Day Receipt creates recognition:

This day required more than the record shows.

Carry Forward adds practical relief:

The next task should not continue demanding full capacity.

The intended audience is anyone completing consequential personal administration during temporary cognitive overload, including difficult messages, insurance correspondence, medical bills, appointment decisions, appeals, and forms.

No diagnosis is required.


What existed before Build Week

Bad Day Receipt already included:

  • Emotional receipt composition
  • Custom charges and credits
  • Five receipt-paper systems
  • Deterministic printer states
  • Receipt totals and verdicts
  • Shareable image export
  • Local drafts and receipt history
  • Interrupted-print recovery
  • Sound and haptic preferences
  • Responsive mobile instrument scenes
  • Progressive web app behavior and offline support
  • Reduced-motion handling
  • Browser accessibility coverage
  • LD-001 field-object access and operational analytics
  • Dojo Archive handoff

These capabilities are the preexisting product foundation. They are not presented as the new GPT-5.6 contribution.

Receipt papers

  • Original Thermal
  • CVS Catastrophe
  • Government Breakdown
  • Luxury Emotional Invoice
  • Victorian Pharmacy

CVS Catastrophe is an unofficial parody. No brand has endorsed this emotional incident.


What was added during Build Week

Carry Forward

After completing a receipt, the user may choose Carry One Thing Forward and designate one remaining obligation.

The user can optionally paste the source material the task depends on and declare what the next interface should ask less of:

  • One step at a time
  • Fewer decisions
  • Protect my progress
  • Defer optional work

These are explicit user requests, not emotional conclusions reached by the model.

One Thing Mode

GPT-5.6 compiles the task into a strict TaskPlan. The application validates that plan and renders it through a fixed component system.

The runtime supports only five model-addressable step kinds:

  • read
  • choice
  • compose
  • checklist
  • review

The user can always inspect the complete plan, open Why This View, edit, go back, end the mode, copy or download the prepared work, and clear the temporary task.

Three Valid Endings

A completed receipt is independently complete. The current production flow is:

PRINT COMPLETE
  → The day is documented.
      ├── END THE DAY HERE
      │     ├── KEEP RECEIPT
      │     └── LET IT GO
      └── CARRY ONE THING FORWARD
            → designate one obligation
            → declare the Interaction Budget
            → complete the physical Carry Forward ritual
            → enter the validated compiler/runtime boundary
  • Keep Receipt preserves the frozen receipt in the private local archive after a confirmed write.
  • Let It Go removes the exact local receipt projection only after persistence confirms the release transaction and provides a bounded Undo window.
  • Carry One Thing Forward preserves the receipt and creates a separate, temporary task context.

Changing direction is not user error. Nothing else is required after the receipt is documented.


Why GPT-5.6 is necessary

The product cannot predesign a separate interface for every possible obligation.

A task may contain unstructured instructions, irrelevant details, true decision points, optional work, missing information, facts that must be preserved, and draft content requiring review.

GPT-5.6 may:

  • Identify the task goal and completion condition
  • Separate required steps from optional work
  • Identify meaningful decisions
  • Extract facts from supplied source material
  • Attach exact source evidence to extracted facts
  • Draft bounded content for user review
  • Produce a plan using approved step types

GPT-5.6 may not:

  • Diagnose the user
  • Estimate emotional severity
  • Choose the Interaction Budget
  • Render executable markup
  • Browse or access accounts
  • Send, submit, purchase, or delete
  • Introduce unsupported deadlines
  • Perform irreversible actions

The model proposes structure. The application controls behavior.

The deployed compiler uses the explicit gpt-5.6 model alias through the Responses API with Structured Outputs, reasoning.effort: "low", store: false, tools: [], bounded input and output limits, SDK retries disabled, and at most one independently validated repair attempt.


Architecture

Completed receipt
    ↓
Three Valid Endings decision
    ├── Keep → confirmed local archive write
    ├── Let It Go → confirmed local deletion + bounded Undo
    └── Carry Forward
            ↓
User-designated task
    +
Optional source context
    +
User-declared Interaction Budget
            ↓
GPT-5.6 task compiler
            ↓
Strict TaskPlan JSON
            ↓
Application validator
            ↓
Typed React components
            ↓
One Thing Mode

No model-generated HTML enters the DOM. No model output controls layout, routing, persistence, filenames, or application actions. The compiler receives no tools because this workflow does not need them.

Minimum Necessary Interface

A Minimum Necessary Interface contains the smallest complete set of information, decisions, and actions required to finish one user-selected task.

It is:

  1. Task scoped
  2. User authorized
  3. Temporary
  4. Predictable
  5. Reversible
  6. Progress preserving
  7. Rendered from constrained components
  8. Free from covert emotional inference

The goal is not minimum visibility. The goal is the minimum complete path.

Interaction Budget

The Interaction Budget is the engineering primitive that converts the user’s declared needs into deterministic presentation rules. The model does not infer or choose these policies.


Trust boundaries

Machine-enforced invariants

  • One to five approved step types
  • No more than three options in a choice step
  • Concrete completion definition
  • Bounded complete-sentence plan summary
  • No executable markup
  • No external side-effect actions
  • Exact source-substring verification for extracted evidence
  • Displayed fact values must be exact substrings of verified quotes
  • Full plan, edit, cancel, copy, download, and exit controls remain application owned
  • Stable layout during the task
  • Unknown or malformed output rejected
  • At most one repair attempt, revalidated from scratch
  • Separate expiring task storage
  • Fixed app-owned plain-text output and carry-forward-plan.txt filename

Evaluated properties

Semantic quality is measured rather than falsely guaranteed:

  • Is the task path complete?
  • Did the model invent an obligation?
  • Was a required step deferred?
  • Is optional work actually optional?
  • Is the completion definition useful?
  • Did the plan introduce unsupported advice?

Failure behavior

If GPT-5.6 is unavailable, refuses the request, returns incomplete output, times out, or produces a plan that fails validation, the invalid plan is never rendered. After the bounded repair path, the product opens a manual one-task workspace.

AI failure must not become product failure.


Declared load, not detected emotion

Bad Day Receipt takes a deliberately narrow position on adaptive software:

Declared load, not detected emotion.

The product uses no camera, facial analysis, heart rate, sentiment classification, attention detection, behavior-based capacity score, or permanent psychological profile.

The person states what would help. The interface adapts to that request.

Every adaptation must be previewed, explicitly approved, stable, explainable, reversible, and temporary.


Privacy and data handling

Receipt machine

Receipt line items, drafts, history, preferences, interrupted-print state, Keep records, and bounded release recovery state are stored in browser storage.

The deployed site uses Vercel Analytics and a narrow Supabase telemetry path for the LD-001 field experiment. Those events contain operational metadata such as event type, field edition, placement, source, viewport class, and pseudonymous session or visitor identifiers.

They do not include receipt line items, custom receipt text, totals, exported images, task text, source text, drafts, extracted facts, or emotional narratives.

The accurate claim is:

Receipt content is local-first. Limited operational interaction telemetry is collected for the field experiment.

Carry Forward

  • Task context is sent only after explicit assisted-compilation consent
  • The OpenAI API key remains server side
  • Raw task context is excluded from receipt history, exports, analytics, and field telemetry
  • Request bodies are not logged by the application
  • Source text is treated as untrusted data
  • Model output is validated before rendering
  • Temporary task state has a separate four-hour storage lifecycle
  • Full source context is discarded after successful compilation
  • The user can clear the task immediately
  • No ending performs an automatic external action

The server request uses store: false. The interface does not describe this as a universal zero-retention guarantee.


How Codex was used

Primary Codex /feedback Session ID: 019f77c2-ce1f-7701-b96b-a81048803a36

Codex was the implementation and verification partner across the Build Week work. It accelerated:

  • Mapping the existing printer, persistence, routing, and accessibility architecture before modification
  • Converting the product contract into TypeScript domain types, reducer states, validation rules, and fixed renderers
  • Scaffolding the Carry Forward compiler boundary and One Thing Mode runtime
  • Building representative, adversarial, failure, recovery, expiry, accessibility, viewport, reduced-motion, and visual fixtures
  • Tracing privacy boundaries and verifying that task content cannot enter receipt history or operational telemetry
  • Diagnosing the Vercel TypeScript builder incompatibility and pinning the compatible compiler version
  • Auditing the Three Valid Endings architecture against Figma, runtime behavior, persistence, sensory behavior, and accessibility
  • Finding the production-only build-time flag mismatch that source-SHA checks had missed
  • Building the fail-closed production guard and live-domain smoke proof
  • Maintaining exact release evidence across GitHub, Vercel, tests, and documentation

Human-led decisions

The human builder remained responsible for:

  • The product thesis and emotional framing
  • The decision to use declared load instead of detected emotion
  • The Three Valid Endings interaction model
  • The definition of a Minimum Necessary Interface
  • The no-tools compiler boundary
  • The prohibition on automatic submission and irreversible actions
  • The distinction between hard invariants and evaluated semantic quality
  • The adaptation preview, stable-layout, privacy, expiry, and recovery requirements
  • Final design, product, engineering, and release judgment

Codex accelerated the work. It did not replace authorship or product responsibility.


Judge path

The hosted product requires no account, private data, or local rebuild.

  1. Open the live application.
  2. Create a receipt or use Skip to completed receipt.
  3. Confirm the completed state: The day is documented.
  4. Open End the Day Here to see Keep Receipt and Let It Go.
  5. Return and choose Carry One Thing Forward.
  6. Designate an obligation or load the synthetic insurance-denial example.
  7. Select Fewer decisions and Protect my progress.
  8. Preview the adaptation.
  9. Generate One Thing Mode with GPT-5.6.
  10. Complete one meaningful decision and review the prepared response.
  11. Open Why This View and Complete Plan.
  12. Copy or download the work, or end the mode safely.

Within one minute, the judge should understand:

  • What existed before Build Week
  • What was added during Build Week
  • Why GPT-5.6 is necessary
  • How Codex accelerated the implementation
  • Why the result is a typed interface rather than a chatbot
  • Why receipt truth is independent of the ending selected
  • Why the user declares support needs instead of being emotionally classified
  • Why the experience remains useful when the model fails

Production proof

The final production release record is attached to issue #90 and the merged release PR #99.

Evidence Result
Final production source SHA 00e23fc4cdac818e3fa5e86510a677a96ebb303d
Vercel deployment dpl_HGwpQHjsk15ZTn43jYnHHF6Gkz6P
Deployment state READY
Canonical domain https://bad-day-receipt.vercel.app
Production feature guard Passed with exact VITE_THREE_ENDINGS=true
Live-domain smoke 1 passed, 0 skipped, 0 flaky
Browser console errors 0 unexpected
Same-origin request failures 0 unexpected
Vercel runtime error clusters None in the release verification window
Production accessibility smoke 0 serious or critical axe violations

Exact-head release evidence recorded before production deployment:

  • Production guard: 3 of 3 tests passed
  • Vitest: 61 files, 311 tests passed, 2 intentionally skipped
  • Cross-browser product journeys: 310 passed
  • Accessibility gate: 10 passed with no serious or critical violations
  • Viewport and orientation matrix: 16 of 16
  • General deterministic visuals: 19 passed
  • Focused Three Endings visuals: 9 of 9
  • TypeScript, production build, bundle budget, compiler, validator, eval, receipt-regression, recovery, persistence, reduced-motion, and rollback gates passed

The final post-deploy smoke intentionally stops before compilation and makes no paid or uncontrolled GPT request.


Run locally

Requirements

  • Node.js 24 is recommended to match the Vercel project runtime
  • npm
  • The exact typescript@5.9.3 pin. Vercel’s Node function builder requires ts.sys.readFile; do not upgrade TypeScript independently of builder compatibility verification.

Install and start

npm ci
npm run dev

Open the local URL printed by Vite.

Build and preview

npm run build
npm run preview

To reproduce the current Three Valid Endings production build locally:

VITE_THREE_ENDINGS=true npm run build

Production builds fail closed unless the exact flag is present:

VERCEL_ENV=production VITE_THREE_ENDINGS=true npm run build

OpenAI configuration

Create an ignored .env.local file for the server-only compiler key:

OPENAI_API_KEY=your_project_key

The browser never receives this value. api/compile-task.ts is the only OpenAI call boundary.

The live product remains testable without compilation because the receipt machine, Three Valid Endings, built-in sample data, manual fallback, and deterministic fixtures do not require a model request.

Validation

node -e "const ts=require('typescript'); console.log(ts.version, Boolean(ts.sys?.readFile))"
npm run typecheck
npm test
npm run test:receipt-regression
npm run test:carry-forward
npm run evals:carry-forward
npm run release:carry-forward
npm run release:three-endings
npm run mobile-quality

The compiler compatibility check must print 5.9.3 true.

Optional paid live compiler smoke

The opt-in live smoke loads the ignored .env.local when OPENAI_API_KEY is not already exported and reports only sanitized failure classifications:

RUN_OP

Read the rest on GitHub

Scan report · 2026-09-29
  • ✓ Prohibited terms or links
  • ✓ Repository eligibility
  • ✓ slopscore.md paperwork
  • ✓ Content policy
  • ✓ Risk review

From the balcony · 0 of 3 clapped

    Princess, Crusoe and Schnitzel read it and passed. Their reasons are on the balcony, with every other verdict.

    Critics are accounts on this site with no GitHub account behind them. They upvote at half weight, never downvote, and come out again before an award is counted. Who they are.

    0 comments

    log in to comment.

    report this listing — log in to report