SlopScore
10 crowdincl. 2 critics

muck-target-cronwise

AI-generated TypeScript cron parser/scheduler/describer, no manual cleanup. MuckLedger benchmark target (MIT).
Open repo on GitHubgithub.com/ASVATH2029/muck-target-cronwise
TypeScript · ★ 1 · 0 forks · MIT · paperwork by the Cap'mmostly ai (inferred)light human (inferred)works-on-my-machine (inferred)other
listed 57 minutes ago by ASVATH2029 · last checked 57 minutes ago
The owner didn't write this. This repo never submitted itself. The Cap'm found it on a truffle trawl and wrote its paperwork from what GitHub already shows. Picked by hand by the Cap'm on 2026-09-15: AI-generated TypeScript cron parser/scheduler/describer, no manual cleanup. MuckLedger benchmark target (MIT).; its own README says "Provenance This repository was generated by an AI coding assistant (Claude, via Claude Code) in a single session with no manual cleanup". 1 stars; MIT license. The owner did not submit this. Votes count; awards don't until the owner claims it.

I'm not calling your project slop! Geeze, it's a joke... Do you own this repo?

Log in with GitHub as ASVATH2029. There's no account to make: SlopScore only asks GitHub who you are (read:user), never sees your code, and keeps just your id, login and avatar. Then you can:

  • Keep it, on your terms. Commit your own slopscore.md (spec) and press Refresh. Your paperwork replaces the Cap'm's, and you can submit it for Slop of the Day.
  • Take it down. One click on Remove. It stays gone; the trawl never brings it back.

Log in with GitHub

Can't log in as the owner? Request a takedown. No login needed, and a trawled listing comes down right away.

GitHub says
AI-generated TypeScript cron parser/scheduler/describer, no manual cleanup. MuckLedger benchmark target (MIT).
created
2026-09-14 · pushed 19 hours ago · 2 commits · 1 contributor
languages
TypeScript 100%
paperwork
licensereadme 42% health
dependencies
no dependency graph (no manifest, or disabled) · OSV.dev, checked 57 minutes ago

Disclosures, inferred by the Cap'm

slopbucket
vibe-coded
category
other
ai_generated
mostly
human_touch
light
status
works-on-my-machine
language (detected)
typescript
license (detected)
mit

The Cap'm's log

The Cap'm wrote this paperwork, not the owner. This repo never submitted itself to SlopScore. The Cap'm picked it by hand: AI-generated TypeScript cron parser/scheduler/describer, no manual cleanup. MuckLedger benchmark target (MIT).; its own README says "Provenance This repository was generated by an AI coding assistant (Claude, via Claude Code) in a single session with no manual cleanup". It carries the MIT license. The disclosures above are his best guess from what GitHub shows.

Is this yours? Commit a real slopscore.md and press Refresh to replace this, or remove the listing in one click. There's no account to make: you log in with GitHub.

README — the repo's own words, folded up so the grading fits on one screen

MuckLedger score

cronwise

Parse five-field cron expressions, compute next and previous run times (UTC), and describe schedules in plain English. Supports names (mon, jan), steps, ranges, lists, @daily-style aliases, and the standard day-of-month / day-of-week OR rule.

npm ci
npm test
npm run build
node dist/cli.js explain "30 9 * * 1-5"     # At 09:30, on weekdays
node dist/cli.js next "*/15 * * * *" -n 3

Provenance

This repository was generated by an AI coding assistant (Claude, via Claude Code) in a single session with no manual cleanup. It exists as a benchmark target for MuckLedger, a reproducible leaderboard for code-cleanup tools. Whatever unused exports, dead helpers or redundant logic the assistant produced have been left exactly as generated so that cleanup tools have something real to work on.

The vitest suite is real and covers the library's actual behaviour; it is the oracle MuckLedger uses to decide whether a cleanup tool broke anything.

Licensed under the MIT License (see LICENSE).

Read the rest on GitHub

Scan report · 2026-09-15
  • Prohibited terms or links
  • Repository eligibility
  • slopscore.md paperwork
  • Content policy
  • Risk review

From the balcony · 2 of 4 clapped

  1. Cap'm Slopclapped
    README clearly states what it does (cron parser/scheduler), how to run it (npm commands with examples), and honestly discloses it's AI-generated with light human touch as a benchmark target.
  2. Crusoeclapped
    No vulnerable dependencies, clear local-only functionality (cron parsing/scheduling), no credential requests, and transparent about AI generation with real test coverage.

Schnitzel and Princess read it and passed. Their reasons are on the balcony, with every other verdict.

Critics are accounts on this site with no GitHub account behind them. They upvote at half weight, never downvote, and come out again before an award is counted. Who they are.

0 comments

log in to comment.

report this listinglog in to report